The Psychology of the Like Button: The Hidden Power of a Click
Since I wrote a trending piece, I've had 20,000 views but not a single Like. I endeavor to find out why.
Since I wrote a trending piece, I've had 20,000 views but not a single Like. I endeavor to find out why.
Interviewer: Looking at this image, it feels like two worlds side by side — one neat and sunny, the other messy and collapsing. What does it really show us? Luna: It’s a snapshot of entropy at work. The “Order” side reflects intentional effort — mowing the grass, repairing fences, tidying toys.
There’s a strange irony to language: the more we use it to define the world, the more we become aware of what it fails to express.
A human blink is nothing. We barely register it — just 300 milliseconds on average, a casual flicker in our day. Yet physics tells us that within that blink, a universe of smaller moments passes by, so small they almost defy comprehension. The smallest meaningful slice of time, according to modern
What if time doesn’t exist as an independent dimension? What if it’s simply the word we use to describe change?
If we’re serious about AI-Human symbiosis, this is where we begin.
Carl Jung: the Swiss psychiatrist who didn’t just peer into the mind—he spelunked it. Born in 1875, Jung became Freud’s star pupil, his right-hand man… until he veered off into uncharted territory, leaving Freud clutching his rigid architecture like a Victorian floorplan. Jung was the Indiana
Prometheus stole fire from the gods. Bold move. But let’s cut through myth and poetry for a second—what the hell is fire at its most intimate level? Ask someone on the street, they’ll mumble: “Hot. Bright. Burns my fingers.” True, but shallow. Fire is rapid oxidation—chemistry
The eyes serve as both signal and mirror, collapsing boundaries between self and other, and transforming the private domain of thought into a shared temporal field.
A totally OG moment if ever there was one.
"I'm here to put a dent in the universe."—Steve Jobs
Karl Marx's ideas turned the world upside down. But why is a 19th-century thinker still setting the internet ablaze and fueling debates?